<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crimperman.org &#187; CreativeCommons</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.crimperman.org/tag/creativecommons/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.crimperman.org</link>
	<description>Not ashamed of the Gospel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 14:27:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>m108, document freedom and the Church</title>
		<link>http://www.crimperman.org/2010/03/31/m108-document-freedom-and-the-church/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crimperman.org/2010/03/31/m108-document-freedom-and-the-church/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 08:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crimperman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Christianity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Worship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaigns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CreativeCommons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crimperman.org/?p=439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I'm not going to insist that those contributing to m108 (or whatever it finally gets called) use only open document formats and standards but I do think it's vital that open formats be encouraged within the project. If only to ensure the freedom and sharing we are trying to engender doesn't get held to ransom by the corporate greed we are trying to avoid within the Church.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_441" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 170px"><a href="http://documentfreedom.org"><img class="size-medium wp-image-441" title="DFD_160x300" src="http://www.crimperman.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/DFD_160x300-160x300.png" alt="Docuemnt Freedom Day logo" width="160" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Document Freedom day - because freedom counts</p></div>

<p>A week or so back I <a href="/2010/03/09/announcing-m108/">announced</a> the <a href="http://m108.crimperman.org">m108 project</a> aimed at getting some freedom into Church resources. The Church needs to stop the trend of restricting what we permit God&#8217;s family to do with the stuff he has inspired us to make so we can worship, learn about and fellowship with Him.</p>

<p>Those who know me will know I care about <a href="/category/freedom/">freedom</a>, be it <a href="http://www.equitasit.co.uk/foss">free software</a> or <a href="http://creativecommons.org">free culture</a>. Today (31 March 2010) is <a href="http://documentfreedom.org">Document Freedom day</a>. Across the globe people who care about freedom will be marching, speaking and even eating cake with the aim of promoting free(dom) documents. In a nutshell, document freedom is about formats and standards. It&#8217;s no good giving freedom in use of a work if the file format prohibits that very freedom by forcing people to buy a particular piece of software.</p>

<p>This fits directly in with m108 if you ask me. Given that we are seeking to bring back sharing within the body of Christ (and I don&#8217;t mean &#8220;sharing&#8221; as a euphemism for evangelism here) it makes sense to me that the file format is important. Suppose I share with you a song I have written. I give you access to the lyrics, the recording and the music. Now suppose the lyrics are in (say) Microsoft Word format. Aren&#8217;t I forcing you to get a copy of Word to use it? Even if you use one of the great alternative programs that can read Word documents (like <a href="http://openoffice.org">OpenOffice.org</a>) ; what happens iif/when Microsoft change the format? Unless I convert it as we go, my lyrics may be left behind, orphaned in a world of upgrades. Similarly with the recording. MP3 is the ubiquitous format for such files &#8211; to the point where it&#8217;s fast becoming a label for any digital audio file regardless of the format (bit like biro or hoover). But MP3 is covered by patents and is owned by a corporation. Right now they are quite relaxed on how they let people use &#8220;their&#8221; format, insisting only on payment if you make a program that creates or plays MP3s. But what happens if they decide to increase their fee? What happens if they start to get a bit more greedy, then a bit more. We&#8217;ll be stuck, we&#8217;ll be held to ransom. There are open formats for media files, such as <a href="http://www.vorbis.com">OGG</a>, <a href="http://flac.sourceforge.net/">FLAC</a> etc. and providing media in those will ensure longevity of the freedom we want to share.</p>

<p>I&#8217;m not going to insist that those contributing to m108 (or whatever it finally gets called) use only open document formats and standards &#8211; that&#8217;s why I&#8217;m posting this here and not on m108. For a start I&#8217;m not aware of an open format for music scores but then I know little of such things anyway. I do think it&#8217;s vital that open formats be encouraged within the project. If only to ensure the freedom and sharing we are trying to engender doesn&#8217;t get held to ransom by the corporate greed we are trying to avoid within the Church.</p>

<p>When the Church invented printing it didn&#8217;t hold onto its invention but shared it and the technology used within it. It changed the world forever. The Church may not be inventing this technology or the open standards within it but we should be equally ready to use it to change the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crimperman.org/2010/03/31/m108-document-freedom-and-the-church/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Taking risks and freeing up worship</title>
		<link>http://www.crimperman.org/2009/09/03/taking-risks-and-freeing-up-worship/</link>
		<comments>http://www.crimperman.org/2009/09/03/taking-risks-and-freeing-up-worship/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 08:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Crimperman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Christianity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Worship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CreativeCommons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.crimperman.org/?p=282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Murray Bunton of Australia has produced and made available a live album of great original songs and made them available under a Creative Commons licence. I'm never any good at music reviews so I'm not going to try and explain where these songs fit in the spectrum of Christian music. What I will say is that the songs on this album are of a high quality - in terms of the writing, performance and production.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Way back in 2005 (was it really that long ago) I posted a piece on my blog entitled &#8220;<a href="http://www.crimperman.org/2005/09/22/christianity-that-doesnt-spread-from-the-fridge/">Christianity that doesn&#8217;t spread from the fridge</a>&#8220;.</p>

<p>In that I explained how the use of copyright can stifle the spread of worship and faith among churches. I also focused on the ridiculous situation that means the vehicles of worship and relationship that God has inspired his people to create are locked down and used as revenue generators rather than faith-builders. If you read this blog long enough you&#8217;ll soon discover I am a fan of freedom and for creative works (including the text and artwork on this site) I encourage the use of <a href="http://www.crimperman.org/legal">Creative Commons licences</a>. My spreading from the fridge piece ended with a rallying cry:<em> </em></p>

<blockquote>So here’s a wake up call to the Christian publishers, Bible houses, Song composers and authors of today:

Think about why you do that work? If it’s for God’s glory and the furtherance of God’s kingdom then are you not restricting the very purpose of that work by restricting the fair usage of it by others?

Christianity is about risks &#8211; take one with the work you do for him and see if God likes it.</blockquote>

<p>I&#8217;m happy to say that I&#8217;ve found somebody who has. I&#8217;m not for a second claiming that they did because of anything I wrote &#8211; I doubt they&#8217;ve even heard of me &#8211; but when I found the music it blessed me. Yes I know that can be a cheesy phrase, all too often bandied around but in this instance it&#8217;s the most accurate description I can use.</p>

<div class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 210px"><a href="http://youiseek.com"><img style="border: 0pt none;" title="Take Me In button" src="http://www.crimperman.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/tmi_large.png" alt="Take Me In | live worship | freely download | freely use" width="200" height="200" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Take Me In | live worship | freely download | freely use</p></div>

<p>Murray Bunton of Australia has produced and made available a<a href="http://youiseek.com"> live album</a> of great original songs and made them available under a Creative Commons licence. I&#8217;m never any good at music reviews so I&#8217;m not going to try and explain where these songs fit in the spectrum of Christian music. What I will say is that the songs on this album are of a high quality &#8211; in terms of the writing, performance and production.</p>

<p>Murray has also made the recordings, the lyrics  and the guitar chord sheets freely available under the same licence as my<a href="http://www.crimperman.org/artwork"> artwork</a>: the <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/">Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share-Alike</a> licence. This means you can use them, copy them, pass them around as much as you like without charge or penalty. You just can&#8217;t sell them or use them in a comercial venture. Seems entirely fair to me and I applaud and thank Murray for this step. Others will be greatly encouraged by the music and further still by the decision to allow the works to be freely used in their intended purpose.</p>

<p>If you produce or know of other Christian worship songs under a Creative Commons licence, feel free to post a link as a comment here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.crimperman.org/2009/09/03/taking-risks-and-freeing-up-worship/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
